Based on the article, “BGT ‘Stunt Dog’ Complaints Spark Investigation” (https://news.sky.com/story/1502408/bgt-stunt-dog-complaints-spark-investigation) published in Sky News on 15 June 2015, the Private Detectives at Leeds talk about the need to install surveillance cameras to control fraudulent crimes.
The article published in Sky News on 15 June 2015: https://news.sky.com/story/1502408/bgt-stunt-dog-complaints-spark-investigation, talks about the investigation initiated to check whether the owner of the winner dog Matisse, a man named Jules O’Dwyer, misled the audience by using a stunt dog.
Several individuals who follow the show “Britain’s got talented” are worried about having paid and voted for a stunt that was misled using both a regular dog and a stunt dog. When the audience was informed that Matisse did not perform the winning stunt of the night, there was outrage. Although the winner shown was Matisse, the producers and O’Dwyer later expressed sheer surprise on the reaction received by the viewers. As a result of the stunt performed by Matisse or Chase, O’Dwyer won a prize worth two hundred and fifty thousand pounds. The producers expressed confusion and a slight apology that the spectators should have been made aware of the use of another dog—Chase. The owner claimed that no conscious decision was made to fool the viewers into believing Matisse performed a stunt that Chase was capable of. As a result of the outrage expressed by the spectators, the OFCOM investigators have decided to look into the matter deeply. The investigators will be looking into the viewers’ concern in the light of the statement that the broadcasters must ensure viewers are never misled into paying or voting for something not clearly broadcast on television.
Based on the article published in Sky News, the Private Detectives at Leeds (https://www.privatedetective-leeds.com) shed light on the importance of surveillance cameras. With the installation of the new and improved state-of-the-art technology, all corners of a room can be kept under the radar. In competitions like the one mentioned above, the presence of surveillance cameras prevents the possibility of rigging during voting. It also puts the contestants on guard, ensuring that no unfair movement is being made. Since every move is being recorded and watched by the producers, the participants defer from using dishonest means to win competitions.
The chief investigator at Private Detectives Leeds (https://www.privatedetective-leeds.com), Ajay Patel, talks about the importance of surveillance cameras in great detail. The expert says, “There are many petty scams and frauds individuals can carry out at work or in popular competitions. These unfair means automatically influence situations at a grander scale. Our job is to ensure that a constant and watchful eye is being kept on the individuals at all times—regardless of whether the know it or not. So if something suspicious does come along, our clients have vivid evidence to settle ensuing disputes without a lot of useless arguments.” The expert can be contacted via the company’s telephone number (0113 335 0772).
Other articles by Ajay Patel Chief Investigator at Private Detective Leeds – The Private Detectives At Leeds Speak About How Running Background Checks Can Minimize A Lot Of Damage And Harm